I was standing at the edge of the crater, staring into the abyss of divorce

A personal reflection on facing the two-choice dilemma at the brink of divorce and choosing growth over escape.

Standing at the edge of a crater

I was standing at the edge of the crater, staring into the abyss of divorce

I was standing at the edge of the crater, staring into the abyss of divorce.

Would I call a divorce lawyer tomorrow - or take a step back from the edge?

Was this a triggered reaction from old trauma… or something I truly couldn’t live with?

I looked into the abyss all night.
I slept on it.
And in the morning, I was ready - not to change my relationship status, but to change myself.

I chose the painful growth path.
To reclaim my life from my triggers.
To not let my discomfort win.

There were things I thought I’d never have to give up - expectations I held for my wife that felt foundational.
But here I was.
Grow or give up.

I had faced what David Schnarch calls the two-choice dilemma.
It shows up when I stop avoiding the inevitable - when I finally have to choose:
Change my own mindset… or leave the relationship.

All along, I’d been trying to change the other person.
That avenue was exhausted.
Now I stood at the fork in the road.
I could keep circling the same arguments, saying:
“If only you would…”
Then I wouldn’t have to change.
Then I wouldn’t have to choose.

But the two-choice dilemma isn’t a weapon. It’s a scalpel.
It peels away everything - justifications, self-deceptions, fantasy - until two options remain:
Undeniably clear. Uncomfortably true.
“Can I change me… or must I leave the relationship?”

Where most people get tripped up is stopping too soon.
They settle on a dramatic pair of options that feel true.
That’s where false dichotomy sneaks in.

As one client told me:
“Either I stay married and lose myself, or I leave and finally get to be me.”
It sounds crisp. But it’s probably not true.
What if the real work is to be himself inside the marriage?
To stop leaking autonomy.
To stop outsourcing self-worth.
To actually claim his identity.
And then - from that solid ground - revisit the question of staying or leaving.

Maybe it’s still a “no” to the marriage.
Or maybe he sees:
It wasn’t the marriage that had to change.
It was his stance inside it.

Here’s the punchline:
Answers are easy. Asking the right questions is hard.

For me, the two-choice dilemma shows up at critical mass.
When the rupture is real.
When “divorce” gets said out loud.
It becomes an inflection point.
Like Mike Oldfield sings in Nuclear:
“Standing on the edge of the crater, staring into the abyss.”
That’s what it feels like.

On one side:
Eat my pride. Change my mind. Let go of my ego.
On the other:
Blow it all up. Watch my son grow up from a distance.

When the options are that stark, I often realize:
I can change my mind.
And once I see the whole picture, it’s not that hard.
Each time I face one of these dilemmas - truly face it - I grow more flexible.
I add plasticity to my thinking.
My ego gets less brittle.
And I update my self-myth.
That’s the real work.
Not choosing the “right” path - but seeing, with full honesty, which two paths actually exist.

Here’s the deeper twist:
When I hold my ground - when I refuse to betray myself just to preserve the relationship -
Then my partner can no longer avoid her own two-choice dilemma.
As long as I’m the one bending, she doesn’t have to choose.
But when I stop bending, her reckoning arrives.
That’s the beauty - and the danger - of the two-choice moment.

At the peak of the rollercoaster, some people jump off the ride.
Not because they have to - but because they don’t know how to stay.

A good divorce is possible.
But it’s not born from panic.
It is not a decision made in anger and frustration
A good divorce is between two people who have done the work - who’ve let their emotions flow through them - and who have come out on the other side.
A good divorce comes from two regulated adults, who’ve exhausted their creative options,
and who can look each other in the eye and say:
“We really tried.”

We’re talking about this in the Radical Sincerity Fellowship this week.
Two-choice dilemmas vs False dichotomies.
How to tell the difference - and how to stop making fear-based decisions that keep you stuck.
Bring your story. Or just learn to recognize the signs.
Either way - you’ll leave clearer than you came.

By Jesper Jurcenoks

Other blog posts

A person leaning against a tree in despair

I was shaking after 4 hours without an answer to my text

A personal exploration of insecure attachment reactions when a partner doesn’t respond, and an invitation to Radical Honesty practice.

2025-08-07
Person playing mobile game late at night

When Coping Becomes Addiction

A personal account of how using a quick mobile game for anxiety relief spiraled into addictive behavior and the strategies used to reclaim balance.

2025-07-16
Orestes standing tormented after his choice

Orestes - Carrying the weight of impossible choices

Exploring Orestes’ myth as a metaphor for moral injury and the internal torment of impossible decisions.

2025-07-15
Orpheus leading Eurydice out of the underworld

Orpheus - This is the moment people lose love - every time.

The myth of Orpheus and Eurydice highlights the pivotal moment when trust falters and love is lost forever.

2025-07-12
Echo repeating words in the forest

I was Echo

The myth of Echo shows how mirroring others and losing your own voice can leave you faded - and how codependency can turn you into an echo in your own life.

2025-07-09
Person walking away from judgment and into the moment in nature

What is the Radical Honesty way to tell somebody that they have a big bum or look terrible?

Jesper Jurcenoks guides you through self-inquiry and compassionate consent before offering sensitive feedback with Radical Honesty.

2025-07-06
Person hesitating to speak truth at a cliff’s edge

Why So Many of Us Stay Silent - Even When We Know the Truth

Exploring why we hesitate to speak our truth and how practicing honesty in safe spaces can rebuild connection.

2025-07-01
Narcissus waiting by the pool

He waited until the flowers grew around him

A modern retelling of Narcissus’s myth shows how waiting for validation in digital mirrors leaves us empty and disconnected.

2025-06-29
Sisyphus carrying a stone up a hill

Whether you believe it or not… you might be living like Sisyphus.

Albert Camus reframes the myth of Sisyphus to illustrate how modern distractions deplete our emotional energy, turning everyday struggles into endless cycles.

2025-06-26
Retreat property in the Sierra foothills

From Managing to Mentoring: Multiplying the Moment with Meaning

Jesper Jurcenoks reflects on 1.5 years of transformation inside the Radical Honesty Institute - and shares the personal dream he's building through Radical Sincerity.

2025-05-01
Jesper in a mountain

What I Learned About Honesty After Losing My Parents

A personal narrative about embracing radical honesty, reconnecting with family, and finding truth amidst loss and regret.

2025-02-25